|Co-operation with: http://www.climaticresearch.com/info.html, http://www.climatic-research.com/, http://www.nature-protection.com/, http://www.natureprotection.net/, http://www.climaticresearch.com/news.htm|
- Climatic Research -
Info.: The “Kolbatz theory” for climatic heating up
- Climatic change with forces of nature -
Our contributions to the nature protection “muna 2003:
© Klaus Peter Kolbatz
Kolbatz says: "We are currently an experiment, which we have no control". "The greenhouse protection are counterproductive and promote global warming."
The UN strikes alarm. Aluminium Gore also participates. Merkel, Bono, Beck anyway. And Sigmar Gabriel has Knut, which zoo adopts small sooo sweet polar bear in the citizen of Berlin. Probably before it is too late.
At present so rather each politician has world-wide one always the same opinion for climatic heating up: Everything completely badly, rather still more badly.
“Exaggerated, unscientific, immoral” now mean renowned scientists opposite MIRROR TV. The authors Steffen Haug and Dirk Schulze spoke among other things with the Meteoroligist Professor Hans von Storch (University of Hamburg), the atmosphere researcher Professor John Christy (University OF Alabama), the Paläoklimatologen Professor Augusto Mangini (University of Heidelberg) and the evolution biologist Professor Josef Reichholf (DO Munich).
Thus Augusto Mangini of the University of Heidelberg at Stalagmiten researches. Over a complicated scientific method it can make the climatic data quasi archived in thousands of years the old lime deposits readable. Mangini has for example for the part of the world climatic advice report, which concerns the reconstruction of the Paläoklimas, a substantially differentiated view on the things: “We have data, which show that there were periods, which were similarly warmly or even still warmer than today during the last ten thousand years.
Today we have to do it with a climatic heating up, which rose within approx. 20 years around at least 7 degrees.
I cannot also understand why CO2 a pollutant to be am, said Kolbatz in 1988 on the IENA888. It is nevertheless the basis for all life on this planet. Without CO2 there is no growth. And with increased concentration the plants grow clearly better. Before some millions years there was as can be prove a CO2 concentration 5 times higher was than today. More carbon dioxide gases in the terrestrial atmosphere protects also against sunning effects, as with the outbreak of the volcano Pinatubo 1991 was proven. Center twentieth century were in the winter -35 degrees the rule and the scientists and politicians spoke of an ice age beginning.
Thus the greenhouse theory is no longer durable and it never gave thus also for the atomic energy a right of existence. Reactor accident in Tschernobyl
Today, the "Kolbatz theory" confirmed and 31,072 American scientists have signed this petition, including 9,021 with PhDs
Also Professor John Christy of the University OF Alabama belongs to the critics. The renowned climatic researchers in numerous ecological studies of the United Nations participated. With its team Christy evaluates extensive data from the atmosphere of our planet. The information about ozone concentration and temperatures supplies satellites and weather balloons. Christy opposite MIRROR TV: “Our newest study shows that the temperature in the atmosphere increases.
Here the “Kolbatz theory” for climatic heating up in the excerpt:
The world-wide need for information (mobile telephones and Sateliten TV), our security needs (military equipment) and our orientation need (government inspection department), created a global network at transmitting plants only in the last 20 years, which radiates electromagnetic waves in the Gigahertz-Bereich in enormous extent into the atmosphere. Until before 20 years there were only temperature innocuous very high frequencies and short waves. We generally call gigahertz waves microwaves. Transmitters, mobile phones and computer processors actually work in the same frequency range as the microwave oven in the kitchen. In use and achievement they differ. In the effect not at all.
Each microwave brings all molecules with a dipole character (main liquids) to swinging, whereby these warm up. The more achievement, the faster and more warmly. „“Our kitchen technology supports „the scientific proof “for it daily.
The achievement of the entire global communication technology is not sufficient, in order to bring us all to cooking, but there is practically no more microwave-free area on this earth. The radiation consists of pure energy, which hurries with speed of light by area and atmosphere and works so long thermally, as it is measurable. Billion oscillations per second let each water particle in air along-swing inevitably and warm up. The entire atmosphere contains more waters than oxygen and heats up thus by microwaves. The momentary energy quantity is quite enough for a heating up around 2 - 3 degrees Celsius.
Since there are no more microwave-free areas, no more temperature can be measured without its influence. The microwave influence is however - due to the described effect - largest with high air humidity.
Thus the temperature in an artificial atmosphere must be compared with high air humidity and the actual environment. Long-term measurements of Karl-Heinz Sander (Baunatal) prove the acceptance that under permanent microwave influence the temperature in the atmosphere rises, because in the artificial, damper atmosphere he always measured a higher temperature than in the actual ambient temperature. The fact that with equal high humidity both atmospheres had also the same temperature occupies the acceptance. When all measurements with different humidity the results of measurement deviated however up to 3 degrees Celsius from each other. Also when measurements with other media, by microwaves (steel wool) was the same remarkablenesses is influenceable to be observed.
The temperature differences depend much on the location and on differences in height. In altitudes over 400m the object temperature (artificial atmosphere) lies by 3 degree over the outside temperature. In higher situations the propagation of the microwaves takes place more unhindered than for example in valleys.
Development of the microwave use
Until 1987 was gigahertz waves only in the military and civilian radar far common. Significant effects could be recognized up to then in direct proximity to transmitting plants.
1988 began the 1987 into space shot first branch RA satellite its transmission activity for the satellite-to-receiver telecasting. In the meantime there is alone 13 branch RA satellites and a multiplicity of further in other systems.
At 1991 the D-net began, in 1992 reached it a recognizable surface covering.
1993 were government inspection department operationally, 1995 world-wide surface covering with 24 satellites were reached.
1994 and 1997 went the two E-nets in the mobile telephone range to the start.
1995 were introduced the DECT standard for cord lot telephones, which spread since then rapidly.
Briefly after the turn of the century W-Lan and Bluetoth were increasingly used in cross-linking by electronic devices.
1987 were thus the last, relatively microwave-free year. The comparison of the average temperatures from 1901 is significant to this year, with around approximately 20 years the longer time interval until 2006. Thus the time in the microwaves substantial increased: In the time of 1901 to 1987 the average temperature runs absolutely evenly. That is, it did not take place the smallest heating up.
Only including the time period of 1988 - 2006 become that clearly, which admits as climatic change is. Now the linear trend line rises clearly and reaches a difference of 0,8 degrees in this period.
Without the microwave-strong years starting from 1988 the trend would by the way have run downward in the late 60's, that 70's and the early 80's. The jump in 1988 (satellite-to-receiver telecasting) and at 2000 (*UMTS) begins to draw the trend line above then after „“.
(more *Über 50 billion euro had to transfer the six UMTS licensees in August 2000 at Ministers of Finance Hans Eichel.)
The scientists are itself as far as possible united that the global heating up is a fact. It takes place already, and it is not a natural occurence, but the result of our acting. The signs are overwhelming and do not leave themselves to not denials.
We experience already changes. Glaciers melt, plants and animals from their territories are driven out, and the number of heavy storms and dry periods increases.
Certainly we can solve this problem. We are even morally obligated to it. Small changes in your daily routine can add up to a large change and contribute to it to stop the global heating up. Now the time came to solve the problem together. - IT NOW ASSET!
Their co-operation is in demand!
further to the “Kimawandel”